“When we feel unseen, all we want is to be seen. When we feel seen, all we want is to serve.”
-Sarita Chawla, Faculty, New Ventures West, and Master Certified Coach
Nearly every weekend I awaken with a wash of glee at the free time before me, before a pall of worry descends: What if I don’t spend my time wisely? What if I don’t make the right decisions? …And mis-use this precious allotment of open, malleable hours? This weekly tussle with self-doubt puts me nose-to-nose with the more existential aspects of my personality. I’m afraid something bad would happen if I made the wrong choice. I can’t tell you what that bad thing would be. But my inner doubt reminds me that it’s out there, waiting to strike.
This Sunday morning, during a typical bout of ruminating about how to micro-manage the day’s unfolding, a radical question occurred to me: “What if you were already good?” In other words, what if none of the choices before me — from taking care of family members, to working extra hard to research a career question, to finally polishing off my spring cleaning — had any impact on my goodness? What if I knew now that I were a good person? How would that change things?
For one thing, I wouldn’t make decisions from a place of insufficiency. I wouldn’t choose based on needing to prove something to myself. Instead, I could make choices from a place of contact with deeper desires. With my actions, I wouldn’t be swatting away self-doubt. I’d be living my values. I’d be able to trust my own judgment, rather than suspect I was liable to go astray at any moment.
A sense of wonder and serenity filled me. What if I am good? I asked. I felt it could be true. And I made my decisions from that heartfelt sense of goodness for the rest of the day. I felt calmer than I had in months. I just kept wondering to myself, “What if you already are good?”
This is not a situation unique to me. People often be act from a place of proving something to themselves. Perhaps they want to prove that they are smart, attractive, unique, powerful, flexible, kind, or loyal. The system of understanding personalities known as the Enneagram suggests that there are nine basic messages that people pursue in the world, depending on their persona. They act in such a way to get the world to give them these messages, or, in effect, to “prove it.” See if any of these messages rings true for you:
- “You are good.” (Related to the desire to have integrity)
- “You are wanted.” (Related to the desire to be loved)
- “You are loved for yourself.” (Related to the desire to be valuable)
- “You are seen for who you are.” (Related to the desire to be oneself)
- “Your needs are not a problem.” (Related to the desire to be competent)
- “You are safe.” (Related to the desire to be secure)
- “You will be taken care of.” (Related to the desire to be happy)
- “You will not be betrayed.” (Related to the desire to protect onself)
- “Your presence matters.” (Related to the desire to be at peace.)
–Adapted from “The Wisdom of the Enneagram” by Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, (New York: Bantam, 1999) pp. 33-34
Of course, our desire to have the world give us this message doesn’t mean we are out of touch with other values and self-expression; often they come mixed. For example, when I help my family, part of me does it to prove to myself I’m good, and part of me does it because I love them and want to take of them. The strands are woven together.
Yet when I am more strongly in touch with a sense that I am sufficient, and can act from that place, it feels very different than when I take action with a thread of self-doubt.
This shows up at work all the time, of course. Who among us has not felt utterly awful when a supervisor seemed to demean or critique or simply not value us? We are striving to get a certain message, and when we don’t get it, we feel deflated, sad, angry, or other forms of rejection.
Another way this shows up is transferring our hopes of validation to the task at hand, and therefore becoming intensely results-obsessed. Soren Gordhamer discusses this striving on the job in his book “Wisdom 2.0.” He described the habit of “futuring,” or fixating on a future time when everything has turned out as we hoped for, at the expense of being fully engaged with and alive in the present moment.
He offers an exercise where we imagine that we already have what we’re aiming for. Then we notice how that feels, and act in our work from a place of wholeness, rather than insufficiency. We will be more creative and effective from the sense of completeness, he suggests. Eugene Gendlin, who wrote “Focusing,” a seminal work about addressing inner conflict through gentle attention to the body, offers a similar technique. When working with a problem in the focusing practice, one skillful technique can be to imagine that the problem is already resolved, and then to notice what shifts in the body as a result.
So, what about you?
What is the message you need to hear?
And…
What if it is already true?
Practice: Being Whole
Find a quiet moment when you have some privacy. Craft your own version of the “already” question. It may help to contact your own existential itch — that feeling you avoid, or the one you feel yourself straining against in a familiar way, time and again. You will know you’ve hit upon wording that resonates with you when merely asking the question suddenly shifts or opens something for you. You will feel yourself responding to it from some inner place.
Now, create a practice where you regularly ask yourself this question three times a day: morning, midday, and evening. You don’t have to answer it when you ask. Just sit with it for 30 to 60 seconds, and feel what happens when you ask it. Notice what unfolds, arises, or reveals itself.
Resources:
“Focusing,” by Eugene Gendlin, (New York: Bantam Dell, 1981), pp. 122-124.
“The Wisdom of the Enneagram,” by Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson, (New York: Bantam, 1999) pp. 33-34.
“Wisdom 2.0: Ancient Secrets for the creative and constantly connected,” by Soren Gordhamer (New York: Harper Collins, 2008), pp. 149-153.







But, We Are More Likely To Be Wrong Even positive labels can mislead us. I could assume an intellectually brilliant colleague — a “genius” — is simply socially awkward by the coffee machine, instead of asking her what’s wrong and discovering there’s a problem that affects a project I’m working on. Using a label can numb the part of us that is curious and empathetic. We stop asking what concerns people have because we already “know” them. So we don’t learn. And we stop wondering about how we’re co-creating the situation, so we don’t grow. Why are labels so misleading? Harvard researcher Daniel Gilbert, among many others, 



















